keneci
News • Science & Tech • Comedy
Britain's Online Safety Act Implementation Already Censoring Immigration Protest Videos
July 25, 2025
post photo preview

The United Kingdom has implemented the censorious Online Safety Act(OSA), which requires age verification to access certain content, including adult material and other potentially harmful content. This law, which came into effect on Friday mandates that platforms such as X, Meta, Reddit, Bluesky, and others implement "strong age checks" to prevent children from accessing inappropriate content.

Platforms must filter out "harmful content" for users under 18, including sexually explicit material, content encouraging dangerous behaviors, and hate speech based on protected characteristics.

Some platforms have already begun enforcing these "highly effective" measures, while others are in the process of rolling them out.

Platforms hosting adult content or "harmful material" must implement robust age checks, such as facial scans, government-issued ID uploads, or payment card verification, moving beyond self-reported age checkboxes.

The UK regulator Ofcom oversees compliance, with penalties for non-compliance including fines up to $23 million or 10% of a platform’s global revenue (whichever is higher) and, in severe cases, court-ordered site blocking or restrictions via ISPs or payment providers.

Reddit has introduced age verification for UK users, requiring them to upload a government-issued ID or take a selfie to verify their age. This is part of the platform's compliance with the OSA, which aims to prevent children from accessing mature content. Some users argue that Reddit’s compliance without legal challenge compromises user privacy, as sensitive data is handled by third parties.

Bluesky has started rolling out age verification for its UK user base, requiring users to confirm they are over 18 to access direct messaging or view adult content.

X is also introducing age estimation technology and ID checks for underage users. If X cannot confirm a user is 18 or older (e.g., via profile birth date, time of sign up, email etc), it defaults users to sensitive content filters, blocking access to adult material.

Meta claims its platforms already comply with the OSA due to their strict no-nudity or no-pornography policies. Instagram and Facebook use a “teen account” feature for users under 18, providing an age-appropriate experience with restricted content and features. The social media giant claims it employs a multilayered age-checking system, including self-reported ages and algorithmic detection, but has not detailed new measures specifically for the OSA. Ofcom will assess whether these meet the act’s requirements.

Pornhub parent company Aylo has committed to “government-approved” age assurance methods but has not specified details. Unlike its withdrawal from France due to similar laws, Aylo praised Ofcom’s approach, suggesting compliance in the UK.

Discord offers UK users face or ID scanning for age verification, limiting access to adult content for unverified or underage users.

XVideos is currently accessible without age checks, with its owner, WGCZ Holdings, opposing the OSA, predicting significant user loss. It’s unclear if they will comply.

Critics, including privacy advocates, warn of risks like data leaks, phishing, and increased surveillance due to third-party age verification tools collecting sensitive personal data.

Ofcom acknowledges that determined users, particularly teenagers, may bypass restrictions using VPNs, though platforms are discouraged from promoting such workarounds.

OSA has already led to the blocking of immigration protest videos, indicating that the law is being applied to a broader range of content beyond just adult material.

Critics argue the OSA’s vague definitions and proactive content moderation requirements could lead to over-censorship, affecting discussions on platforms like X, forums, or Discord. Small sites may struggle to comply, potentially exiting the UK market, while larger platforms can afford tailored compliance systems.

Users and advocates, including the Open Rights Group and Electronic Frontier Foundation, express concerns about data privacy, citing risks of leaks or hacking from third-party age verification providers.

Smaller sites face disproportionate compliance costs, potentially leading to market exit, while larger corporations like Meta or Aylo can absorb costs, raising concerns about market consolidation.

The OSA is seen as a model for other anti-free speech countries like France and Australia, which are implementing similar age verification laws. The European Commission is also exploring EU-wide age verification, with France trialing measures.

community logo
Join the keneci Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
SpaceX Starlink Internet Satellites

With Starlink internet, data is continuously being sent between a ground dish and a Starlink satellite orbiting 550km above. Furthermore, the Starlink satellite zooms across the sky at 27,000 km/hr! MORE VIDEOS ON KENECI NETWORK RUMBLE CHANNEL: https://rumble.com/c/Keneci

00:28:08
Elon Musk, DOGE Speak On Waste And Fraud

US Department of Government Efficiency Services (USDS) led by Elon Musk speak on the "mind-boggling" fraud and waste in UInited States federal government

00:00:45
January 17, 2025
SpaceX Launches Starship 7th Test Flight

SpaceX successfully executed its second-ever “chopsticks” catch of a Super Heavy booster (or Booster 14) using the “Mechazilla” launch tower on Thursday(Jan. 16), during the seventh uncrewed test flight of the company's 123-meter Starship rocket. However, the megarocket's upper stage(or Ship 33) was lost approximately 8.5 minutes into the flight in a “rapid unscheduled disassembly(RUD)” or explosion

00:10:30
Welcome to Keneci Network!

Join the conversations!

September 17, 2024
Charges Against Sean 'Diddy' Combs In Grand Jury Indictment

The rapper was charged with racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and transportation to engage in prostitution in the indictment unsealed Tuesday(Sept. 17)

Combs-Indictment-24-Cr.-542.pdf
"Dear husband"

A Dubai princess took to social media to announce she's divorcing her husband who's worth $40B.

She claims the billionaire is busy with his "other [female] companions"

post photo preview
post photo preview
Trump Threatens Tariffs, After EU Hit Google With $3.5B Antitrust Violations

The European Union has fined Google $3.46 billion for abusing its dominant position in the digital advertising market, accusing the company of creating inherent conflicts of interest by controlling both the buy and sell sides of online advertising. In response, US President Donald Trump has threatened to initiate a Section 301 trade investigation, which could lead to retaliatory tariffs, calling the fine "unfair" and "discriminatory" against American companies.

The European Commission announced the $3.46 billion fine on Friday, stating that Google's control of both the buy and sell sides of the online advertising market created "inherent conflicts of interest." The investigation, which began in 2021, found that Google favored its own advertising services, violating EU competition laws Regulators have ordered Google to end its "self-preferencing practices" and resolve these conflicts of interest, with the company having 60 days to propose a remedy.

The Commission noted that structural remedies, such as a forced divestiture of parts of its adtech business, remain a possibility if Google's proposals are inadequate.

President Trump reacted swiftly on Truth Social, calling the fine "unfair" and "discriminatory" towards US companies. He claimed the $3.5 billion penalty was taking money that would otherwise go to "American Investments and Jobs" and stated, "Very unfair, and the American Taxpayer will not stand for it!" Trump explicitly threatened to start a Section 301 proceeding to "nullify the unfair penalties being charged to these Taxpaying American Companies."

A Section 301 investigation paves the way for Washington to impose import taxes under a fortified legal basis through the Commerce Department, and the president has a lot of latitude to issue tariffs over unfair trade practices under the provision. Section 301 is the same trade tool Trump used to justify tariffs on China starting in 2018.

Trump also referenced a previous $17 billion fine against Apple, suggesting it should be reversed He claimed the total fines against Google from the EU now amount to $16.5 billion, including the latest penalty.

The fine marks the fourth antitrust penalty for Google from the EU The investigation focused on Google's dominance in online display advertising, where personalized banners and text ads appear on websites. The EU has previously warned that past penalties and requirements have not effectively curbed anti-competitive practices.

Google has rejected the decision, calling it "wrong" and stating it would appeal, arguing that the fine is unjustified and that the required changes would harm European businesses.

The company maintains that providing services for both ad buyers and sellers is not inherently anticompetitive and that there are more alternatives available than ever before.

The timing of Trump's threat is notable, as it comes just a day after he hosted Google's CEO Sundar Pichai, co-founder Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg and other tech leaders at a White House dinner to discuss artififical intelligence implications with First Lady Melania Trump. This confrontation adds tension to a recently agreed-upon US-EU trade deal aimed at reducing US tariffs on EU imports.

“The European Union must stop this practice against American Companies, IMMEDIATELY!” Trump wrote. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Trump Rebrands US Dept. Of Defense To Dept. Of War, Restoring Its Pre-1947 Name

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Friday, formally changing the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War, a move he framed as a restoration of American military strength and a rejection of what he termed "woke" policies within the Pentagon.

The rebranding, which requires congressional approval for permanence, was announced in a ceremony in the Oval Office, where Trump, flanked by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine, stated the change was necessary because the U.S. "never fought to win" under the previous name, attributing past military stalemates to political correctness.

Hegseth declared the change was about "restoring the warrior ethos" and fighting "to win, not to lose," while Caine's remarks were not detailed in the provided sources.

"Really it has to do with winning. We should have won every war. We could have won every war, but we really chose to be very politically correct or wokey and we just fight forever," Trump said, flanked by Hegseth and Gen. Caine. "We had it, and we won World War I, we won World War II, we won everything before, and as I said, we won everything in between," Trump added. "And we were very strong. But we never fought to win. We just didn’t fight to win. We would have won every one of those wars quickly, but they went a route that I think was probably politically correct, but not correct for our nation. So I think the Department of War sends a signal." He also stated, "We won the first world war, second world war- everything before that and in between and then we decided to go woke and changed the name to 'Department of Defense', so we're going 'Department of War'"

Hegseth on his part said, "This name changing is not just about renaming, it is about restoring. Words matter... Restoring the warrior ethos, restoring victory and clarity, restoring intentionality... The War Department is going to fight decisively, not endless conflicts. It's going to fight to win, not to lose. We are going to go on offence, not just defence; maximum lethality, not tepid legality; violent effect, not politically correct. We are going to raise up warriors, not just defenders"  He also stated, "We won World War I and World War II not with the Department of Defence but with the War Department"

The Department of War was established by President George Washington in 1789 and served as the primary agency for the U.S. Army until 1947. In that year, President Harry Truman signed the National Security Act, which merged the Department of the Army (formerly the Department of War), the Department of the Navy, and the newly created Department of the Air Force into the National Military Establishment. This entity was renamed the Department of Defense in August 1949.

The recent rebranding is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration and Defense Secretary Hegseth to reverse policies deemed "woke" or politically correct, including reversing the renaming of military bases from Confederate names and renaming a Navy ship previously named after gay rights activist Harvey Milk.

The White House has already updated its social media and the Pentagon's website to reflect the new name, with the domain changing to "war.gov." The move has been met with enthusiasm from some on the right, but skepticism and scorn from others.

Read full Article
post photo preview
500th Falcon Landing: SpaceX Launches Starlink 10-57 Mission

SpaceX successfully launched the Starlink 10-57 mission on Friday, Sept. 5, deploying 28 Starlink satellites into low Earth orbit from Launch Complex 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

The Falcon 9 rocket lifted off at 1232 UTC. The Falcon 9 first stage booster(B1069) landed about 8.5 minutes after liftoff on the 'Just Read the Instructions' drone ship in the Atlantic Ocean approximately 8.5 minutes after liftoff, completing its 27th flight, and marking the 500th successful recovery of Falcon, an orbital-class rocket, a significant reusability milestone for SpaceX.

"Falcon 9 touchdown on the Just Read the Instructions droneship, completing the 500th launch and landing of an orbital class rocket," SpaceX wrote on X.

B1069 had previously flown on missions including CRS-24, Eutelsat HOTBIRD 13F, and 22 prior Starlink missions. This landing was the 135th recovery for the "Just Read the Instructions" drone ship.

The Falcon 9 upper stage deployed the 28 satellites into a north-easterly trajectory in low Earth orbit(LEO), about one hour and four minutes after launch.

Starlink 10-57 was the 111th Falcon 9 mission for SpaceX in 2025 out of a total of 529 since 2010. The company's broadband megaconstellation now numbers more than 8,370 active satellites.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals