keneci
News • Science & Tech • Comedy
Dragonfly Mission To Saturn's Moon Titan To Be Launched By SpaceX: NASA
November 26, 2024
post photo preview

NASA on Monday announced that SpaceX will launch the agency's $3.35 billion Dragonfly mission that will investigate the life-hosting potential of Saturn's huge moon Titan. The Elon Musk company's Falcon Heavy rocket will launch the nuclear-powered car-sized rotorcraft during a three-week window in July 2028.

Dragonfly lander will spend six years making its way to Titan, the second-largest moon in the solar system (after Jupiter's Ganymede). The rotorcraft will operate for about 2.5 Earth years on Titan's surface, flitting from place to place to get an in-depth look at a variety of landscapes.

Titan hosts seas and lakes of hydrocarbons, making it the only body beyond Earth known to host stable liquids on its surface. Some scientists think the frigid satellite may be capable of supporting life -- perhaps on its alien surface or in its suspected subterranean ocean of liquid water. This is what Dragonfly is designed to investigate.

"With contributions from partners around the globe, Dragonfly’s scientific payload will characterize the habitability of Titan's environment, investigate the progression of prebiotic chemistry on Titan, where carbon-rich material and liquid water may have mixed for an extended period, and search for chemical indications of whether water-based or hydrocarbon-based life once existed on Saturn’s moon," NASA officials wrote in Monday's update.

SpaceX has launched some of NASA's high-profile science missions. Falcon Heavy also launched the agency's Psyche asteroid probe and Europa Clipper spacecraft, in October 2023 and October 2024, respectively.

community logo
Join the keneci Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
SpaceX Starlink Internet Satellites

With Starlink internet, data is continuously being sent between a ground dish and a Starlink satellite orbiting 550km above. Furthermore, the Starlink satellite zooms across the sky at 27,000 km/hr! MORE VIDEOS ON KENECI NETWORK RUMBLE CHANNEL: https://rumble.com/c/Keneci

00:28:08
Elon Musk, DOGE Speak On Waste And Fraud

US Department of Government Efficiency Services (USDS) led by Elon Musk speak on the "mind-boggling" fraud and waste in UInited States federal government

00:00:45
January 17, 2025
SpaceX Launches Starship 7th Test Flight

SpaceX successfully executed its second-ever “chopsticks” catch of a Super Heavy booster (or Booster 14) using the “Mechazilla” launch tower on Thursday(Jan. 16), during the seventh uncrewed test flight of the company's 123-meter Starship rocket. However, the megarocket's upper stage(or Ship 33) was lost approximately 8.5 minutes into the flight in a “rapid unscheduled disassembly(RUD)” or explosion

00:10:30
Welcome to Keneci Network!

Join the conversations!

December 09, 2025
Bitcoin White Paper By Satoshi Nakamoto

Bitcoin white paper

Bitcoin_White_Paper.pdf
September 17, 2024
Charges Against Sean 'Diddy' Combs In Grand Jury Indictment

The rapper was charged with racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and transportation to engage in prostitution in the indictment unsealed Tuesday(Sept. 17)

Combs-Indictment-24-Cr.-542.pdf
post photo preview
Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump's IEEPA Tariffs

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday, struck down President Donald Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 to impose sweeping global tariffs, ruling 6-3 that the law does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.

Chief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion, stating that IEEPA’s grant of authority to “regulate … importation” does not include the power to impose tariffs. He emphasized that the Constitution assigns tariff-setting power to Congress, and that IEEPA contains no reference to tariffs or duties.

Roberts wrote, “The President asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope,” which requires “clear congressional authorization” under the major questions doctrine. The majority included Roberts, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The decision invalidated tariffs imposed under IEEPA, including a 10% baseline global tariff and higher rates on countries like China, Canada, and Mexico, which Trump justified as responses to trade deficits and the flow of illicit fentanyl.

The Court said that no prior president had interpreted IEEPA as authorizing tariffs, and that tariffs are fundamentally different from other IEEPA tools like asset freezes or sanctions because they are revenue-raising measures. Roberts stressed that Congress would not “relinquish its tariff power through vague language” and that the law’s broad interpretation would allow the president to impose duties “of unlimited amount and duration, on any product from any country.”

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh argued that tariffs are a traditional and lawful tool for regulating importation, citing historical precedent and the fact that presidents have long used tariffs to manage trade. He warned that the ruling could lead to “substantial multi-billion-dollar refund chaos,” as the government may be required to return billions collected under the now-illegal tariffs. The court did not rule on refunds.

Kavanaugh emphasized that the major questions doctrine should not apply in foreign affairs cases and noted that Trump could still impose tariffs under other statutes, including the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232), the Trade Act of 1974 (Sections 122, 201, 301), and the Tariff Act of 1930 (Section 338).

The legal battle began in 2025 when small businesses and a coalition of 12 states sued over the tariffs, arguing they exceeded executive authority. Lower courts had already ruled the tariffs illegal, and the Supreme Court consolidated the cases as Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump and V.O.S. Selections v. United States.

The ruling does not affect Trump’s Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum, which remain in place. The decision is a major setback for Trump’s economic agenda, which relied heavily on tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations.

Despite the ruling, Trump announced plans to impose a new 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The government may now face billions in refund claims, with businesses like Costco, Crocs, and Revlon already seeking full reimbursement.

Following the ruling, Trump delivered a fiery press conference at the White House, calling it “deeply disappointing” and “a disgrace to our nation.” He denounced the six justices who ruled against him, accusing them of being “unpatriotic and disloyal to the Constitution,” and specifically attacked Gorsuch and Barrett, whom he appointed.

Trump vowed to reimpose tariffs using alternative legal authority, announcing plans to impose a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows temporary tariffs for up to 150 days without congressional approval. He stated this would be “over and above” existing tariffs.

“Therefore, effective immediately, all National Security TARIFFS, Section 232 and existing Section 301 TARIFFS, remain in place, and in full force and effect," Trump wrote in part on Truth Social. "Today I will sign an Order to impose a 10% GLOBAL TARIFF, under Section 122, over and above our normal TARIFFS already being charged, and we are also initiating several Section 301 and other Investigations to protect our Country from unfair Trading practices. The new TARIFFS, totally tested and accepted as Law, are on their way.”

Trump has since signed a new executive order on tariff. “It is my Great Honor to have just signed, from the Oval Office, a Global 10% Tariff on all Countries, which will be effective almost immediately. Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP,” he wrote late Thursday

 
Read full Article
February 19, 2026
post photo preview
Former Prince Andrew Arrested Over Latest Epstein Files Revelations

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former Prince Andrew, was arrested Thursday, on his 66th birthday, at his home on the Sandringham Estate in Norfolk, England, on suspicion of misconduct in public office. The arrest, carried out by Thames Valley Police, followed revelations from newly released U.S. Department of Justice documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The allegations center on claims that while serving as the UK’s special representative for international trade and investment (2001–2011), Andrew shared confidential government information with Epstein during his tenure as the UK’s special representative for international trade and investment (2001–2011).

Emails released as part of the Epstein files appear to show Andrew forwarding sensitive reports about his official visits to Hong Kong, Vietnam, and Singapore, as well as a confidential brief on investment opportunities in post-war Helmand Province, Afghanistan, to Epstein.

The files reportedly show him sending the material to Epstein shortly after receiving it (one just five minutes later; another on Christmas Eve 2010). This is a common-law offence of misconduct in public office, which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment and involves the willful abuse or neglect of public trust by a public official. Police opened the formal investigation after assessing a complaint (partly triggered by anti-monarchy group Republic and new evidence from US files).

Andrew was taken into custody around 8 a.m. GMT, photographed leaving Aylsham Police Station in Norfolk later that evening, and released under investigation—meaning he has not been charged but remains under scrutiny. Police conducted searches at his Sandringham residence and his former home, the Royal Lodge in Windsor, Berkshire.

The 66-year-old has denied any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. He previously settled a civil case with Virginia Giuffre, a prominent accuser who alleged he sexually abused her when she was a minor, though he has consistently denied those claims.

King Charles III, Andrew’s brother, expressed "deepest concern" over the arrest in a statement, emphasizing that "the law must take its course" and affirming full support for the police investigation. Notably, neither the King nor Buckingham Palace was informed in advance of the arrest.

This arrest marks the first time in modern history a senior member of the British royal family has been taken into custody, making it a historic and highly sensitive moment for the monarchy. The incident follows years of scrutiny over Andrew’s ties to Epstein, culminating in the revocation of his royal titles in October 2025.

U.S. President Donald Trump spoke to reporters aboard Air Force One on Thursday, shortly after Andrew's arrest, describing the arrest as “a shame”** and repeatedly called it “very sad”** and **“so bad for the royal family.” He emphasized that he is an “expert” on the Epstein case, stating he has been “totally exonerated” and “did nothing” wrong.

When asked if American associates of Epstein could face similar arrests, Trump said, “Well, you know, I’m the expert in a way, because I’ve been totally exonerated.” He also referenced King Charles III, who is scheduled to visit the U.S. in April, calling him a “fantastic man, king.”

Trump claimed that “nobody used to speak about Epstein when he was alive, but now they speak,” and added that Epstein was “against me” and “fighting me in the election.”

Read full Article
February 18, 2026
post photo preview
3 Dead After Transgender Gunman Opens Fire At Rhode Island Ice Hockey Game Killing Ex-wife

Robert Dorgan, 56, who used the name Roberta Esposito, opened fire at the Dennis M. Lynch Arena in Pawtucket, Rhode Island, during a high school boys’ ice hockey game Monday, killing his ex-wife Rhonda Dorgan and their son Aidan Dorgan, who was a senior at North Providence High School and playing in the game.

Three others, including a family friend, were critically injured before Dorgan died by suicide with a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Pawtucket Police Chief Tina Goncalves confirmed the incident was a targeted family dispute. An adult daughter of Dorgan later told reporters, “He shot my family, and he’s dead now,” describing her father as “very sick” and “mentally ill.”

Witnesses described confusion at first, mistaking gunshots for crowd noise. A parent attempted to intervene but was overpowered. Dorgan was armed with two guns, both recovered at the scene.

The shooting reportedly stemmed from a long history of family conflict, primarily tied to Dorgan’s gender transition. In 2020, Rhonda Dorgan filed for divorce, initially citing gender reassignment surgery and narcissistic personality disorder traits as grounds—reasons later replaced with “irreconcilable differences.”

The divorce was finalized in June 2021. Dorgan, who had lived in Florida as a truck driver, reportedly faced threats from his father-in-law, who allegedly demanded he leave the family home after his transition and threatened him with violence, including being “murdered by an Asian street gang.”

Dorgan reportedly had a documented history of mental health struggles and family disputes. He accused his mother of assault in 2020, and court records show he reported threats from his father-in-law, though charges were later dismissed.

In the days before the shooting, Dorgan posted disturbing messages online under the name Roberta Dorgano, including a warning: “Keep bashing us. But do not wonder why we Go BESERK,” in response to anti-trans rhetoric. He also shared a video of a woman loading ammunition while running on a treadmill.

On the day of the shooting, Dorgan posted on social media: “I have a beloved RHONDA too, my friend,” referencing a post by Rep. Thomas Massie about his late wife. The attack unfolded around 2:30 PM during the game.

The shooter's daughter Ava Dorgan (20), who was not at the game, reportedly confirmed the next day that her mother Rhonda and brother Aidan were killed, while her maternal grandparents and her mother's friend were critically injured.

Ava described her father as having mental health issues for years, said the family had not been close to him recently, and noted he had no known prior violence or gun ownership that she was aware of. (Some reports paraphrase her linking his issues to deeper problems beyond gender identity.)

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals